Burj Dubai Skyscraper Forum Index Burj Dubai Skyscraper
Burj Dubai Skyscraper - The World''s Tallest Tower
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

sea level rise, is dubai ready?

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Burj Dubai Skyscraper Forum Index -> General
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
tiikeri



Joined: 21 Jul 2007
Posts: 14

PostPosted: Mon Dec 31, 2007 5:26 pm    Post subject: sea level rise, is dubai ready? Reply with quote

seems like the earths temperature is gonna increase.. so the sea level will rise accordingly.. what are the thoughts you guys have

here is a map of a 7 meter sea level rise.. it does show a disturbing pictures for dubai.. is this dubai in the year 2040?

http://flood.firetree.net/?ll=25.1204,55.1781&z=6
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rolf29
Burj Fan


Joined: 24 Oct 2006
Posts: 146
Location: GERMANY, Darmstadt. Wissenschaftsstadt;die Stadt i.Walde u.d.Tor zu Odenwald u.Hessisch. Bergstrasse

PostPosted: Tue Jan 01, 2008 1:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Problematical.
Ihey will have to make dikes (like Germnay, The Netherlands, ...).
_________________
I feel sometimes a little bit skyscraper excitement
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Neon Lite



Joined: 27 Jan 2007
Posts: 32
Location: Dryden, Ontario, Canada

PostPosted: Thu Jan 03, 2008 4:19 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Umm...a 7 meter increase???? 2040????
Any scientific proof to that besides a website http://flood.firetree.net/ that scales 0 to 14 meters? Rolling Eyes
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
tiikeri



Joined: 21 Jul 2007
Posts: 14

PostPosted: Fri Jan 04, 2008 11:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Neon Lite wrote:
Umm...a 7 meter increase???? 2040????
Any scientific proof to that besides a website http://flood.firetree.net/ that scales 0 to 14 meters? Rolling Eyes


the 2040 year was followed by a questionmark.. so it isnŽt a statement
but hereŽs the first link i found about it on google

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2004/04/0420_040420_earthday.html

here another link for another page i found
http://www.johnstonsarchive.net/environment/waterworld.html

according to it.. if all the ice would melt the sea level would rise 60-75 meters.. but that would take alot longer
think about it.. thereŽs estimatly 30,000,000 km3 of ice on the planet
and if all that would melt.. and stream down to the oceans.. then there would be an impact
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
MikeM



Joined: 11 Jun 2008
Posts: 3

PostPosted: Wed Jun 11, 2008 7:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

[quote="tiikeri"]
Neon Lite wrote:
Umm...a 7 meter increase???? 2040????
Any scientific proof to that besides a website

the 2040 year was followed by a questionmark.. so it isnŽt a statement

according to it.. if all the ice would melt the sea level would rise 60-75 meters.. but that would take alot longer
think about it.. thereŽs estimatly 30,000,000 km3 of ice on the planet
and if all that would melt.. and stream down to the oceans.. then there would be an impact


The NASA TOPEX/Poseidon satellite measuring antartic sea levels reports a rise of 1.67 mm per year -

Yes, that's ONE-POINT-SIX-SEVEN MILLIMETRES!!

It will take several thousand years at that rate for sea levels to go up by 7m - The 1.67mm is probably within the device's margin of error

There's also evidence that the Antartic ice pack may be getting THICKER. (NASA ICEsat) - Because the Artic ice is nearly all floating ON the sea, if somehow it all melted, it would have NO effect on global sea levels.

There has also been a huge reduction in sunspot activity - no one seems to know why but Al Gore is trying to find someone to blame it on

Low sunspot activity corresponds to a COOLING trend. So IF the greenhouse gas theory actually works (believe it or not, that has never been proven) we may just need the extra warmth as temperatures cool, icepacks increase and sea levels DROP!

By all means, let's get rid of pollution wherever we can but we're in far more danger from politicians than from any "climate change"

Can we maybe focus on getting rid of political pollution first?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rolf29
Burj Fan


Joined: 24 Oct 2006
Posts: 146
Location: GERMANY, Darmstadt. Wissenschaftsstadt;die Stadt i.Walde u.d.Tor zu Odenwald u.Hessisch. Bergstrasse

PostPosted: Sat Jun 28, 2008 12:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

[quote="MikeM"]
tiikeri wrote:

The NASA TOPEX/Poseidon satellite measuring antartic sea levels reports a rise of 1.67 mm per year


Yes. But since 1993 we have 3 mm the year ( http://www.atmosphere.mpg.de/enid/2rv.html ). As far as 2100 we should have a complete upper level of "only" 22 - 44 cm (not 7 m). A big problem for Bangladesh and others. No problem for BD Smile
_________________
I feel sometimes a little bit skyscraper excitement
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
MikeM



Joined: 11 Jun 2008
Posts: 3

PostPosted: Mon Jun 30, 2008 3:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

[quote="rolf29"]
MikeM wrote:
tiikeri wrote:

The NASA TOPEX/Poseidon satellite measuring antarctic sea levels reports a rise of 1.67 mm per year


Yes. But since 1993 we have 3 mm the year As far as 2100 we should have a complete upper level of "only" 22 - 44 cm (not 7 m). A big problem for Bangladesh and others. No problem for BD Smile


They are using old data - NASA had to recalibrate Topex/Poseidon and their numbers are now under 2mm/year and are within the device's margin of error so it could be less, could be more

Even at 3mm/year, it would take 300 years to raise sea levels one meter

Also, IF seas are warming, the arctic ice cap might melt but that would not raise the seas as it it 90% floating ice. BUT if the seas at the antarctic are warming, that will cause increased precipitation over the south pole - precipitation in Antarctica falls as snow, settles as ice - Increased ice on land will LOWER sea levels.

I don't dismiss climate change but am extremely sceptical about mankind's influence on it - Volcanoes and sunspots have a far greater impact. Various people are jumping on shaky data making wild assumptions, extrapolating same and presenting them as fact to scare us all into paying taxes and fees and making a LOT of people very rich - Just look at how much money Al Gore has made from his campaign - and look at HIS carbon footprint....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
marc
Burj Fan


Joined: 02 Mar 2007
Posts: 105
Location: Wijk en Aalburg, The Netherlands

PostPosted: Tue Jul 01, 2008 10:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have to agree with mikem to a large extend.

In the Netherlands it is now very, very obvious that the govenrment WANTS us to drive more km, and to smoke more tobacco, drink more alcohol.
They are hot on the taxes they get for it.
Although they say differently.

Energy saving is necessary to lower your expenses on electricity and gas.
It pays off well.

And sea level rise?
I live approx. 2 m below sea level. No problem, no fears!!!
_________________
Marc
Wijk en Aalburg
The Netherlands
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tiikeri



Joined: 21 Jul 2007
Posts: 14

PostPosted: Thu Jul 03, 2008 5:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

MikeM wrote:
Just look at how much money Al Gore has made from his campaign - and look at HIS carbon footprint....


išve heard Gore gives 100% of his profit to charity from the sales of the dvd inconvenient truth..
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
MikeM



Joined: 11 Jun 2008
Posts: 3

PostPosted: Thu Jul 03, 2008 5:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

tiikeri wrote:
MikeM wrote:
Just look at how much money Al Gore has made from his campaign - and look at HIS carbon footprint....


išve heard Gore gives 100% of his profit to charity from the sales of the dvd inconvenient truth..


His overall earnings since jumping on the climate change bandwagon are in the tens of millions or more. Some report his earnings as over $100 million.

He earns tens of thousands of dollars every time he speaks. I believe his "basic speaking fee" is $175 THOUSAND per appearance - Giving away the profit from DVD sales (and profit numbers are really easy to "tweak") is pennies by comparison.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tiikeri



Joined: 21 Jul 2007
Posts: 14

PostPosted: Fri Jul 04, 2008 8:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

MikeM wrote:
tiikeri wrote:
MikeM wrote:
Just look at how much money Al Gore has made from his campaign - and look at HIS carbon footprint....


išve heard Gore gives 100% of his profit to charity from the sales of the dvd inconvenient truth..


His overall earnings since jumping on the climate change bandwagon are in the tens of millions or more. Some report his earnings as over $100 million.

He earns tens of thousands of dollars every time he speaks. I believe his "basic speaking fee" is $175 THOUSAND per appearance - Giving away the profit from DVD sales (and profit numbers are really easy to "tweak") is pennies by comparison.


true.. that is a lot of money for a speach.. talk about getting hyped..
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Burj Dubai Skyscraper Forum Index -> General All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Protected by Anti-Spam ACP